If not functioning labels, then what?

“If we aren’t supposed to use ‘high or low functioning,’ what else can we use to describe that person?”

This question is always frustrating to me. It typically comes from well-meaning people, but I have a hard time understanding why they need to assign labels to people that aren’t like them. Within the neurodiversity movement, we do not use functioning labels.

Autism is just autism. And autism is human. I’m an autistic person, not a neurotypical person with some kind of disease that can be classified or labeled. While every autistic person is different, there is no mild, severe, low or high functioning autism. We’re just autistic people with a wide variety of strengths, support needs, interests, personalities, opinions, etc.

Some argue that by not using functioning labels, we’re pretending that non-speaking autistics or autistics with high support needs don’t exist. This couldn’t be further from the truth. We’re simply saying we’re all autistic. We’re all human. There is no us and them—just us. We value every autistic person and view them as our equals, even if some need more support.

Because autism is diversity of the human condition—a totally normal variation in human neurology—people need to realize that they’re describing a complex human being, not a medical disorder.

What if I described a parent as low functioning (based on MY observations) because they didn’t cook 3 meals a day, had dirty dishes in their sink, laundry everywhere, and they didn’t play with their kids enough? What if the truth is that they'd been sick and therefore unable to do the things I mentioned? How wrong would I be to call them low functioning?

What if I called a parent high functioning because from an outsider’s perspective, it looks like they’ve got it all together and they’re parenting with ease? What if it’s taking every ounce of energy they have, every dollar they make, and they desperately need help…but they won’t get it because they’ve been deemed high functioning?

Functioning labels are never accurate. They fail to capture who we are as humans—our likes, dislikes, strengths, struggles, personalities, experiences, etc. High functioning implies that a person doesn’t need support and if they aren’t keeping up it’s because they’re just lazy. It places unfair and inaccurate expectations on that person and prevents them from getting the help they need. Low functioning overlooks a person’s strengths and unique qualities, while assuming they aren’t competent and can’t live rich, fulfilling lives. They may also lack the support they deserve because others assume they won’t benefit from it. Both labels are wrong.

So to answer the initial question: instead of labels, be descriptive. Neurotypicals can’t be put into neat, categorized boxes and neither can autistic people. For example:

Sam is autistic and enjoys drawing and learning about animals. She loves talking about her dog and is learning to care for him more independently. She's great at teaching herself new skills when given the time and freedom to figure things out. Sam communicates verbally most of the time, but sometimes she needs AAC. Sam prefers having a couple close friends that she’s comfortable with and needs time to herself to indulge in her interests and recover from her overstimulating school environment. When overwhelmed, Sam will shutdown. This isn’t intentional. Sam can focus more easily and is less overwhelmed when using noise cancelling headphones in the classroom. Because of interoception issues, Sam may need reminders to go to the restroom throughout the school day to prevent accidents. And because of fine motor difficulties, she needs help opening her lunch, tying her shoes, and buttoning/zipping up her clothes.

Yes, that’s longer and takes more effort than “high or low functioning,” but look how much you learned about Sam in that short paragraph. By being descriptive, both her strengths and needs were acknowledged, as well as interests that are important to her. Would high or low functioning tell you any of that?

Kaylen Randall, MS, CCC-SLP received her degree in speech-language pathology from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. She is an openly autistic SLP in Pensacola, FL. Kaylen specializes in aphasia, literacy, developmental language delays, and neurodiversity-aligned support for autistic individuals. Additional information about Kaylen and her practice can be found at www.facebook.com/KaylenRandallSLP.


Recent Posts

See All

The Problem with ABA Therapy

Historically, autism has been viewed as a disorder--something that needs to be fixed, treated, or cured. Something that requires "intensive intervention." Yes, some autistic children need a lot of sup

I Think I Might be Autistic, Now What?

Since writing An Autistic SLP’s Experiences with Social Communication for the Therapist Neurodiversity Collective, multiple SLPs have contacted me for more information because the article resonated so